> Right, that sounds a lot better than GPL then. > I prefer a license that wouldn't turn off people or businesses, yet is > open, and doesn't get us sued.. MPL sounds good to me so far..
+ and keeps proper attribution to those who have done the work... which MPL does BTW. I wouldn't even mind a MPL with a BSD addition - not dual like Indy, but MPL with required attribution. :) > Chad, why would certain parts need to be GPL'ed? Right now i don't see > why we would have to? That wasn't my assertion. I think it was Williams. Im against GPL on any part of this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
