On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dual licensing seems to have worked a few times, also, what keeps people > unhappy about LGPL? GPL with a vasectomy: I think that may be a good > compromise.
All of SharpOS is currently licensed under GPLv3 with the *Classpath linking exception* which is basically the *correct* way to do the LGPL. The Classpath linking exception basically allows any code to link to any SharpOS code, provided the two pieces of code are compiled separately and connected by at least *some* form of interface. Basically the same thing that LGPL does. > Can the SharpOS admin please discuss a merge with Ensemble. Under what authority do you speak for Ensemble? I thought Scott was the head honcho there -- is he really that interested in merging our two projects because that would mean compromises in his design. -- fury long name: William Lahti handle :: fury freenode :: xfury blog :: http://xfurious.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
