The motor from the Buick GN was sort of represented in the list in the body of the syclone.
The syclone 4.3 was loosely based on the 3.8 from the buick. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pindell, Tim P" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:43 AM Subject: Re: SD> Top 10 Cars That Don't Deserve Their Engines > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Robert Meier >> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 11:32 AM >> To: Jabba Truck; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: SD> Top 10 Cars That Don't Deserve Their Engines >> >> Guess it says something that I have had one of the GM products on the >> list >> too, the 92 Achieva SCX. Some guys are boob guys, some like butts, but >> I >> like high performance 4 cylinder engines. > > Hear, Hear! Anybody can make power with unlimited displacement. It > takes talent on the part of the engine developers to do more with less > and still have something just as durable. That's what I try to explain > to the unwashed masses in regards to my GLHT. > > I wonder why the turbo Buicks didn't make the list. Those were sweet > engines (IMO, for the same reason mentioned above), but the actual > package was crap, though I still like the shape of those GM G-bodies > even today. Perhaps the Cyclone/Typhoon covers that engine... > > > ___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________ > ShelbyDodge mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge ___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________ ShelbyDodge mailing list [email protected] http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge
