That cam was a Mopar Performance unit, and the sprocket was whatever
FWD Performance had at the time.  I'm not sure if it was the Fidanza
sprocket or not. It's a nice piece, however.

I installed the cam and the sprocket at the same time. I got the
adjustable sprocket because the OEM cam has a different centerline
than the MP unit, so the OEM sprocket would not have been properly
degreed to the new cam.  It was a long time ago, so I don't remember
the centerline numbers of either cam or the OEM sprocket, but they
were different enough that I felt the need to do it right with the
adjustable sprocket.  I was concerned that I would not get the
performance (that's a relative term) out of the cam had I simply
dropped it in and lined up the dots. I know it sounds like I was
changing 2 variables, but the thing operates as a system rather than 2
parts operating independently.  Know what I mean?

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:16 PM, David Salamone
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>I had a 1989 Dakota (with the common-block 2.5 not the Magnum.) I
>>installed the "max-torque design" cam P4452763 and an adjustable
>>sprocket from FWD Performance. (Note: cam is for "slider" style
>>followers, not the rollers.) Made a world of difference. Wish I still
>>had that truck...
>
> That would be the Fidanza one, correct? Did you use that performance cam 
> initially without the adjustable cam spocket?
>
> I'm curious whether the performance was mainly increased by the cam itself or 
> the sprocket.
>
> Still awaiting some feedback on any other upgrades like oversize pistons or 
> milling the head...
>
> David
>
>
>>On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, David Salamone
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well it looks like the bottom end of the engine in my 1994 Voyager minivan 
>>> is going bad and will need a rebuild. I initially thought it was just a 
>>> headgasket going bad, but the significant oil blow back issue continued 
>>> after the headgasket was replaced so it looks like one of the cylinders is 
>>> going bad.
>>>
>>> It's original 1994 2.5 was replaced years ago with a low mile 2.5 EFI motor 
>>> that came out of a wrecked 1989 Spirit. It's served me well over the years 
>>> and I'm looking for some tips on not only rebuilding but adding some 
>>> moderate enhancements while I'm having it done.
>>>
>>> I've got a good local turbo Dodge guy to do the work, and I was going to 
>>> looking for some ideas on a good combination of parts & tips to make it 
>>> reliable, durable and enhance the performance. It's currently a fairly 
>>> stock EFI motor and I don't want to go through the significant expense & 
>>> effort of trying to add a turbo & get it to work with 1994 electronics.
>>>
>>> When the cat went bad a while back, I used the opportunity to add a 2.5" 
>>> exhaust with a Flowmaster muffler all the way back with (just for fun) a 
>>> split set of dual tips coming out the back. The EFI manifold was only 2" so 
>>> I might try to get the manifold opened up so I no longer have the 
>>> restriction at the downpipe of going from 2" to 2.5". I've heard a good 
>>> machine shop could open up the EFI manifold and make it work with a 2.5" 
>>> donut & downpipe.
>>>
>>> Since I've got to do the bottom end, I was thinking of finally removing the 
>>> balance shaft assembly. We also spotted an oil restrictor when we were 
>>> doing the headgasket, I've heard it's good to remove those to improve upper 
>>> oil flow. Thoughts?
>>>
>>> What about enlarging the cylinders for a larger set of pistons for improved 
>>> horsepower? Any ideas on size & style?
>>>
>>> I think being an 1989 2.5 it's already got a roller cam. It was suggested 
>>> to freshen up the valves since we were already there (for a better balanced 
>>> package). Any thoughts on some affordable updates to the top end?
>>>
>>> We're going to be starting the work pretty soon so I'd like to get a solid 
>>> game plan together. Thanks.
>>>
>>> David Salamone
>>> Positive Impressions
>>> [email protected]
>>> ___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________
>>> ShelbyDodge mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge
>>
>>___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________
>>ShelbyDodge mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge
>

___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________
ShelbyDodge mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge

Reply via email to