Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an oddly-named parameter.
John On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of SNS that > uses Shindig now. > However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed in the > trunk code set of Java > implementation. > > Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future? > > Best regards, > Yoichiro > > --- > Yoichiro Tanaka > mail-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/ > > >
