Hi John,
Thank you for your answer. I think that bpc is pretty oddly-name,
too. :)
I'll use nocache today.
Well, I seem that bypassing XML cache with bpc is general way for
developers.
I think that it should change the content written in following url
from bpc to nocache.
[Bypassing orkut's application XML cache]
http://code.google.com/apis/orkut/docs/orkutdevguide.html#bpc
Best regards,
Yoichiro
On 2008/06/24, at 2:48, John Hjelmstad wrote:
Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an
oddly-named parameter.
the
John
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi.
We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of
SNS that
uses Shindig now.
However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is
processed in the
trunk code set of Java
implementation.
Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
Best regards,
Yoichiro
---
Yoichiro Tanaka
mail-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
---
Yoichiro Tanaka
mail-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
