Is it an error? Historically, this was the only way to disable caching on orkut.
~Arne On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Yoichiro Tanaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > Thank you for your answer. I think that bpc is pretty oddly-name, too. :) > > I'll use nocache today. > > > > Well, I seem that bypassing XML cache with bpc is general way for > > developers. > > I think that it should change the content written in following url from > bpc > > to nocache. > > > > [Bypassing orkut's application XML cache] > > http://code.google.com/apis/orkut/docs/orkutdevguide.html#bpc > > > That's just an orkut documentation error. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > Yoichiro > > > > On 2008/06/24, at 2:48, John Hjelmstad wrote: > > > > Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an > >> oddly-named parameter. > >> the > >> John > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi. > >>> > >>> We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of SNS > >>> that > >>> uses Shindig now. > >>> However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed in > >>> the > >>> trunk code set of Java > >>> implementation. > >>> > >>> Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Yoichiro > >>> > >>> --- > >>> Yoichiro Tanaka > >>> mail-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > --- > > Yoichiro Tanaka > > mail-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/ > > > > > > > -- OpenSocial IRC - irc://irc.freenode.net/opensocial
