It looks fine to me, though I've never tried it first hand. As long as it supports primitives, collections, simple objects, and comments in serialized data it's OK.
However, I really don't want a third json library to depend on, either. Hiding the implementation behind some interfaces would probably be a prerequisite before we go plugging in yet another json library. On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the guys on another project found this, which appears to support > limited serialization of generic types. > > http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ > > Although I did a net.sf serialize for json,..... should we be using this ? > At first glance it looks cleaner that json net sf to me, its AL2. > > Ian >
