On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking that it might be a replacement for the net.sf version, I > notice its (c) Google, so I am wondering if its a library known to you ? It's the first I've personally heard of it. > > Ian > > > On 1 Sep 2008, at 18:26, Kevin Brown wrote: > > It looks fine to me, though I've never tried it first hand. As long as it >> supports primitives, collections, simple objects, and comments in >> serialized >> data it's OK. >> >> However, I really don't want a third json library to depend on, either. >> >> Hiding the implementation behind some interfaces would probably be a >> prerequisite before we go plugging in yet another json library. >> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> One of the guys on another project found this, which appears to support >>> limited serialization of generic types. >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ >>> >>> Although I did a net.sf serialize for json,..... should we be using this >>> ? >>> At first glance it looks cleaner that json net sf to me, its AL2. >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> >
