I was thinking that it might be a replacement for the net.sf version,
I notice its (c) Google, so I am wondering if its a library known to
you ?
Ian
On 1 Sep 2008, at 18:26, Kevin Brown wrote:
It looks fine to me, though I've never tried it first hand. As long
as it
supports primitives, collections, simple objects, and comments in
serialized
data it's OK.
However, I really don't want a third json library to depend on,
either.
Hiding the implementation behind some interfaces would probably be a
prerequisite before we go plugging in yet another json library.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the guys on another project found this, which appears to
support
limited serialization of generic types.
http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/
Although I did a net.sf serialize for json,..... should we be
using this ?
At first glance it looks cleaner that json net sf to me, its AL2.
Ian
