I'm leaning towards using trunk too, especially since we now have a
stable branch.
Anyone object?
On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
My general preference is that trunk is volatile, and you branch the
stable
bits. I don't see a lot of value in worrying about the stability of
trunk,
or whether things have to be yanked. In all likelyhood, very little
is going
to be completely removed, it will more likely just need to be
adapted as
prototypes prove or disprove the feature.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We need a place to prototype the 0.9 proposed changes inside of
Shindig and
insure that the separate proposals are will properly integrate.
This could
be done one of two ways:
1) Apply proposed changes to trunk. If a proposal is amended or
rejected
we may have to revert.
2) Apply proposed changes to a feature branch off trunk, while
merging in
any upstream fixes.
If #2 I'll volunteer to keep it in sync with trunk as much as
possible.
I have some patches burning a hole in my laptop and I'd love to get
them
integrated and reviewed :)
--
Paul Lindner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Lindner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
