No objection here On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm leaning towards using trunk too, especially since we now have a stable > branch. > > Anyone object? > > > On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Kevin Brown wrote: > > My general preference is that trunk is volatile, and you branch the stable >> bits. I don't see a lot of value in worrying about the stability of trunk, >> or whether things have to be yanked. In all likelyhood, very little is >> going >> to be completely removed, it will more likely just need to be adapted as >> prototypes prove or disprove the feature. >> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> We need a place to prototype the 0.9 proposed changes inside of Shindig >>> and >>> insure that the separate proposals are will properly integrate. This >>> could >>> be done one of two ways: >>> >>> 1) Apply proposed changes to trunk. If a proposal is amended or rejected >>> we may have to revert. >>> 2) Apply proposed changes to a feature branch off trunk, while merging in >>> any upstream fixes. >>> >>> >>> If #2 I'll volunteer to keep it in sync with trunk as much as possible. >>> >>> I have some patches burning a hole in my laptop and I'd love to get them >>> integrated and reviewed :) >>> >>> -- >>> Paul Lindner >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > Paul Lindner > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
