On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, paresh mathur wrote: > >> wasn't good but because it was very good. The dissapointement was that such >> a think is lurching in mid air because all of us are too engulfed in making >> shoes better. We all know that no lib or softwere can be bug free so why not >> start working on the inspiration and at least bring out the 1.0 version. I > > Well, a lot of the mods to Shoes at the moment are about making > confusing things (Namespace issues) less confusing, and getting rid > of fairly serious bugs people are running into. We've also been > discussing how to improve the manuals still further. All of these > things will help with teaching and motivating new programmers. > We've not reached a stable state for the start of the academic year, > alas, but I think that some more patience will pay off. It's not > like developers of Alice 3.0 are way ahead of schedule either; > getting this sort of thing right takes time.
Right on and well said. +1 for not rushing things. -- Seth Thomas Rasmussen http://greatseth.com
