I have been watching this thread and had a couple thoughts:

1. A personal observation for myself as well as most that I have fitted
that had a quick swing. A heavier SW while not compromising a heavy
total weight has mostly proven better. Do not view any SW measurement as
TOO much, but rather insure these are matched by some reason and that
the total weight is not too much.

PS: Don't try to fool the SW scale (easy to do) by using a lighter grip.
Measure the club un-gripped as the scale measures on a different pivot
point (fulcrum in scale language) than what the golfer actually uses. (A
difference of roughly 8 inches) (IE: Do you really think that a given
club with a GP Tour Wrap swings that much different than the same club
with a GP Tour Wrap Lite. The scale says so though the golfer doesn't;
but then again SW is not a dynamic measurement - refer to Jorgenson's
work or previous posts from DaveT, etal)

2. While SW is important to match because:
A: To insure consistency in your work as viewed by you
B: To insure consistency in your work as viewed by potential other
clubmakers that measure these clubs

it is not the only factor. Total weight as well as MOI should be taken
into consideration. Keep in mind that SW is a static measurement and
that MOI is dynamic For further information, I would again refer to
Jorgenson's work.

I am not certain if a specific SW should be targeted without these other
items being taken into consideration. I have even noted that with
golfers w/ large hands, it appears that the grip dia has an effect on
their "apparent" view of "SW"

For those that wonder: larger grip = lighter, smaller grip = heavier.
Seems to be more pronounced in shorter swings. I would be interested in
any other fitters that may have observed this (yes the grips were the
same weight as were the shafts, heads, and SW on the std scale).

Always seeming to bump up against a strange new observation

Mark





[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Thank you Tom. What you have just outlined is what I have been telling
> people for years.  Still it seems the majority of people think that
> there is something magical about swingweight. Perhaps it is due to
> it's relative ease of measurement and that the measurement is directly
> related to a club rather than just a general weight measurement. I
> really don't know why most people are fascinated with it though, apart
> from the consistency aspect.
>
> Rich "Mac" McHattie
> Mac's Golf

Reply via email to