I think we have a problem here. I've never seen a heavier shaft result in a lower swingweight (assuming no change in length, grip weight, or head weight). And, from the physical definition of swingweight, it can't happen unless the shaft's CG is so high that it is less than 14" from the butt.
Do I misunderstand what you're saying?
DaveT
At 10:23 PM 11/5/02 -0500, you wrote:
heavier shaft = lower swingweight -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-shoptalk@;mail.msen.com]On Behalf Of Dave Tutelman Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Lob Wedge swingweightingAt 07:35 PM 11/5/02 -0500, you wrote: >If you're using parallel tip dynamic golds for the irons, and want the >swingweight of a 'matching' LW to be lower than it would be using the cut >shaft, try the taper tip wedge shaft of the same flex and a piece of >fishing line - the taper tip shafts are constant weight and will be >heavier than a cut parallel tip at the same length and therefore produce a >lower swingweight. > >Pat K Pat, I'm not sure I understand. I think you are suggesting something that will result in a heavier shaft, and therefore a higher swingweight. What am I missing here? Thanks, DaveT
