Bernie,

Questions,questions?? Me again!!

Expound a little for me!

Type 1 and Type 2 shafts??

By the time you get this, Turkey be long gone.

Get well! All the best!!

Brian


----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Baymiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: shaft flex v.s. frequency


> Dave,
>
> > Thanks for the input.  Any idea on what type of shot shape aligning the
> > spine at 12oclock on a Type 1 shafts generally produces?
>
> Have no idea. Never tested that one. Figure someone has, though.
>
> > Well, placing S1 at 3 or 9 might be agreeable to you depening on whether
> > the shaft is a Type 1 or 2, right?  Since if it's a Type 1 placing S1 at
> > 3 would generally put N1 at 9 which is what you recommend.
>
> Yes.  I always (knock on wood) get good performance and a consistent match
> when I use N @ 9, S @ 3 alignment for Type 1. Think Dan said he does, too.
>
> >A Type 2 shaft would end up with N1 at 12 or 6...
>
> I don't like the hard side of the shaft down, so if I get an N1 on the
wrong
> side of the S1, I'll probably use the S1 at 12 and the N2 at 9. Or, if the
> spine wasn't huge, I might look for FLO near the spine plane and align
that
> to the target. I know for me, that will result in a few more draws than
> fades (tested that) and though it might not work for some players, it's an
> option for me. There's probably a tighter impact area with the weak plane
> aligned at target and S1 at 12, where it is more effective in reducing toe
> bob on the downswing. Am strictly guessing, but would be an interesting
test
> for me to try someday. Someone has probably done that test, too.
>
> Bernie
> Writeto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to