Yeah, I know about the BOM heel issue and the USGA, supposedly there will
be a new batch of BOMs getting here in 4-6 weeks.  I'm really curious to
hear the real story and actualy differences between the original BOM, the
M-series what what will become the third series of BOM.  Apparently the
heads are non-conforming because of an over-extending heel.  Has anyone
measured them to confirm that they are non-conforming?  How much of a
difference in heel area is there between the original series and M-series?
 Sounds like a big fiasco, I sure wouldn't want to be in Steve Almo's
shoes!

I get plenty of length with steel shafts already, with the 450 I used to
have I was getting about 250-280 yards on solid shots.  When trying longer
and lighter graphite shafts I occasionally hit it farther but don't catch
it on the screws as often.

Thanks for the input on the shaft flex, I will order a full flex softer if
I decide to get one of these non-conforming BOMs.

-Dave

Ron Kellison said:
> I've built several of the clubs, and I heartily recommend that a
> graphite shaft be used if you really want to realize the potential of
> this head.   I have discovered that you should assume a full flex
> difference (10 cpm) between a normal insertion depth and the BOM.  My
> favourite shaft for this head is an Apache MFS65N (in dark blue), which
> means that I order an A-2 flex if I want an R-2 in the finished club.
> I've also discovered that most Canadian golfers aren't big fans of the
> "gaudy without being tasteful" Orange Crush colour, but love theblue
> version and the results they get with the shaft.
>
> FWIW, I now understand that the USGA has deemed the BOM non-conforming,
> even if it carries the "M" serial number.  I make certain that each of
> my customers know this before I order the head.  That said, it's still a
> beautiful, well performing head.

Reply via email to