I don't much care about puring - but am I misremembering, or did not USGA say
"spining" which after all is in some sense, "puring" could not be uh,
mentioned. It was one of the dumbest rulings I've read; go ahead and spine your
shafts, but don't tell anybody about it. So, if Nike is spining its clubs and
bragging about it, isn't that flaunting the rule - if there is a rule? TFlan>
But then Titleist sells a ton of ProV's to golfers they are completely > wrong
for. At least Puring won't hurt any thing but your wallet.> > Alan> > > At
12:41 PM 2/17/2009 -0500, you wrote:>>Good article in Golfweek by Jim Achenbach
on the new SST Pure machine. >>According to the article, "Tiger had his clubs
checked and adjusted by >>SST. As revealed by Nike insiders, the company
assembled a dozen sets of >>irons for Woods, with only two sets being PUREd. In
blind testing, Woods >>picked those two PUREd sets as his primary set and
backup set.">>>>The shaft companies don't seem to think much of it. Maybe
because of this:>>>>"Now, for the first time, the industry is going to be able
to monitor the >>torsional stiffness of a shaft very quickly at playing length.
It can be >>done in 6 seconds. Some people are not going to like this, because
many of >>the (torque) numbers printed on shafts right now are nominal, at
best.">>>>Here's the
article:>>>>http://sstpure.com/media/golfweek090207.html>>-->>>>>>>>>>Thanks!>>John
Muir>>shoptalk>>>>sponsored by>>http://aldilavoodoo.com>>>>>>>>>>-->>Shoptalk
** Sponsored by the new Aldila Voodoo.>>Learn more at http://aldilavoodoo.com/>
> --> Shoptalk ** Sponsored by the new Aldila Voodoo.> Learn more at
http://aldilavoodoo.com/
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_022009
