Steven Jan Springl wrote: > Tom > > When zones contains: > > fw firewall > lan ipv4 > tst ipv4 > p1:tst port > p2:tst port > > interfaces contains: > > lan eth0 - nosmurfs,tcpflags > tst br0 - routeback,bridge,optional,tcpflags,rosmurfs > p1 br0:eth1 > p2 br0:eth2 > > and policy contains: > > fw all accept > lan p2 accept > all all drop > > the following iptables rule is created: > > -A lan2p2 -j ACCEPT > > but nothing points to the lan2p2 chain. > > Should it be possible to have a policy from a zone that is not part of a > bridge to a bridge port (line 2 of the policy file above)?
I have this covered in one of my earlier experiments but forgot it in the current one. Fixed in r6477. Thanks, Steven -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
