Steven Jan Springl wrote: > On Thursday 07 June 2007 00:41, Tom Eastep wrote: >> Steven Jan Springl wrote: >>> Tom >>> >>> When zones contains: >>> >>> fw firewall >>> lan ipv4 >>> tst ipv4 >>> p1:tst port >>> p2:tst port >>> >>> interfaces contains: >>> >>> lan eth0 - nosmurfs,tcpflags >>> tst br0 - routeback,bridge,optional,tcpflags,rosmurfs >>> p1 br0:eth1 >>> p2 br0:eth2 >>> >>> and policy contains: >>> >>> fw all accept >>> lan p2 accept >>> all all drop >>> >>> the following iptables rule is created: >>> >>> -A lan2p2 -j ACCEPT >>> >>> but nothing points to the lan2p2 chain. >>> >>> Should it be possible to have a policy from a zone that is not part of a >>> bridge to a bridge port (line 2 of the policy file above)? >> I have this covered in one of my earlier experiments but forgot it in >> the current one. Fixed in r6477. >> >> Thanks, Steven >> -Tom > Tom > > Should it be possible to have a policy from the bridge to a port on the same > bridge e.g. using the above zone and interface definitions:
In principle, such a policy (or rule) is not a problem but I haven't been able to come up with a good way to detect that case yet. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
