On 08/12/2007, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > On 08/12/2007, Jonathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 08/12/2007, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> It is my intention that distributions apply those > >>> patches consecutively to the base release to produce the distribution > >>> release. > >> OK, thanks Tom, that is a useful clarification, I'll stick with that > >> strategy. > > > > Actually, I wonder if it wouldn't be useful to have a clearer > > directory structure. Perhaps: > > > > shorewall-4.X.Y containing the base tarballs > > shorewall-4.X.Y/errata as it currently is > > shorewall-4-X.Y/patched containing the patched tarballs > > > > or some other structure which better reflects the situation. > > That strategy hides the latest packages where the average fool will never > find them. I would rather have shorewall-4.X.Y/base contain the base packages.
Sure, that would work too. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
