Will Murnane wrote: > Just reading through this thread, it struck me that perhaps it would > be a good idea to write unit tests for Shorewall, especially with the > advent of the shorewall-perl version. Perhaps it'd be a good idea to > specify what behavior is expected from each rule in a > machine-checkable way, so that it's easy to verify that changes in one > area don't affect other functions.
I agree, Will. I have gathered a set of configurations which I run new versions of the compiler against (and compare the output) but my testing is neither systematic nor complete. > Test::Unit might be a good choice > for this. I'd be interested in helping with this some after May is > over, when I'm on summer vacation. > > I would welcome your help. Thanks! -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
