pt, To chime in, the way to get Shotwell to run with full logging is like this:
$ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell After you exit Shotwell, examine ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log -- Jim On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lucas Beeler <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam & pt: > > How did you guys manage to reproduce this? I've tried, tried, and > tried again. What's more, when I look at my log file, I see this: > > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'carol' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/27/red.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'red' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/27/red.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'friends' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/27/red.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'green' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/28/green.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'john' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/28/green.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'friends' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/28/green.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'dave' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/28/blue.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'friends' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/28/blue.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > L 31408 2011-09-12 15:12:23 [DBG] knocking out flat tag 'blue' from > file '/home/lucas/Pictures/Photos/2011/08/28/blue.jpg' because it's > already known as a hierarchical tag component > > which indicates to me that the tag knockout code is doing what it's > supposed to. The role of the tag knockout code is to remove flat tags > that are merely duplicates of hierarchical tag components so as to > prevent child tags from re-appearing as top-level tags during f-spot > import -- i.e., the knockout code should've closed #4081. When you run > Shotwell with logging turned on, do you see similar messages? > > Cheers, > Lucas > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Adam Dingle <[email protected]> wrote: > > Piergi, > > > > On 09/10/2011 11:57 PM, pt wrote: > >> > >> Any clue? I've put the three photos (after the shotwell import) in the > >> same directory with a csv version of the output of exiftool as well: > >> http://traversin.org/shotwell-test/ Ciao ciao, Piergi > > > > I just tested this and you're right: we thought we had fixed this bug in > > 0.11.1, but it's still present. I've reopened the ticket: > > > > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4081 > > > > Hopefully we can fix this for 0.11.2. > > > > adam > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
