On 12-05-08 06:18 AM, oliver wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:40:06AM -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Also, on a fresh import from a media card, Shotwell has chosen a
most unusual naming scheme for my photos:
[...]
Sure?
I think the scheme is not that bad, but maybe means
sonething different...
I see no reason why they should be renamed. AAA.jpg should remain
AAA.jpg and not become AAA_CR2.jpg. It makes it lose the most obvious
association (even though it's properly marked in the DB).
pat@pat-desktop:~$ ls -1 ~/Pictures/2012/05/01/
(...)
IMG_2978.CR2
IMG_2978_CR2.jpg
It does properly identify them as RAW+JPEG, so maybe there is some
sort of disconnect between the naming it expects and what is there?
I would expect these to have the same basename and different
extension!
Are you sure that theese jpeg's are NOT created by shotwell?
The naming scheme looks like a generated jpg.
You should compare those files with the files from
the camera... to be sure that they are the camera files.
Not so. The files are exactly the same as on the CF card, and if they
were generated by Shotwell, they would have "_embedded" or "_shotwell"
in the name. I see lots of those generated for CR2s that are not
properly associated with their respective JPEG.
So, no ideas from the devs?
Thanks,
--Pat
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
