On 12-05-08 06:34 PM, oliver wrote:
I see no reason why they should be renamed. AAA.jpg should remain
AAA.jpg and not become AAA_CR2.jpg. It makes it lose the most
obvious association (even though it's properly marked in the DB).
[...]

If generated, it would make sense.

Sure, but the eMail you're responding you clearly states that is not the case.

Not so. The files are exactly the same as on the CF card, and if
they were generated by Shotwell, they would have "_embedded" or
"_shotwell" in the name.
[...]

Ah, you read the whole source code and verified, waht you wrote here?

Is there a point to this?

I read the import code, the classes for Raw and Jpeg, and database. I saw first-hand the "_embedded" files generate from database items that do not have a JPEG friend, and thus the embedded JPEG is extracted. I saw "_shotwell" files getting generated when the developer is set to Shotwell.

All I am trying to determine is if there is any way I can help fix what is an obvious bug dealing with raw+jpeg import from directories, which is a new feature in 0.12 and isn't quite there.

--Pat
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to