On 12-05-08 04:08 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote:
The "Camera" developer option has known issues in Shotwell 0.11.x and 0.12.x, as explained in Shotwell FAQ here: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-just-imported-a-RAW-photo-into-Shotwell-and-it-looks-overexposed-or-underexposed-why-is-this-and-how-can-I-fix-it. Even if you've set your default RAW developer to "Camera," Shotwell may, incorrectly, do its own RAW development. Like I say, this is a known issue, and one potential workaround (i.e. switching the developer to "Shotwell" and then back to "Camera" again) is discussed in the FAQ.
Alright, so good answers about the naming and RAW developer. I can probably change the code locally to do the naming I want. Not sure about this comment above about its own RAW development, since I'm not seeing this symptom on files that do get properly imported as RAW+JPEG.
I think the real issue is still about how when I import my ~/Pictures directory, which has f-spot imported AAA.jpg and AAA.cr2 filenames, about 10% of the files are not recognized as single images (and only then I get the _embedded and _shotwell files).
How can I help debug this? --Pat _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
