On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 04:38, Adam Jimerson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > So I have noticed that /etc/version and /etc/shr-version isn't updated >> on >> > upgrades. For example the latest image on >> http://build.shr-project.org/shr- >> > unstable/images/om-gta02/ is 20091124, I know I am current because opkg >> > doesn't show any new updates but according to /etc/version and /etc/shr- >> > version this is what I have >> > >> > r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /etc/version >> > 200911200853 >> > r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /etc/shr-version >> > Tag Name: pre-nov2009-core-updates >> > VERSION: 214ca5592a29f4040c19711ad3ea1685cd238251 >> > Branch: shr/merge >> > Build Host: opmbuild >> > Time Stamp: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:07:30 +0100 >> > >> > I don't know if this is done by design, but I think this makes >> troubleshooting >> > and bug reports useless because the first thing that will come to mind >> is >> > "they are not up to date" >> > -- >> > "We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other >> reason >> > than only freedom can make security more secure." Karl Popper >> >> Yup, these files are not upgraded, as Timestamp contains just image >> generation data. >> >> -- >> Sebastian Krzyszkowiak >> dos >> _______________________________________________ >> > Which is ok, because we got are (at least ATM) a rolling release distro, > and snapshots don't make sense anyway. :P > Well its a good thing I asked than, will these ever be updated in SHR's future or are they just there because they can be?
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
