On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Adam Jimerson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 04:38, Adam Jimerson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > So I have noticed that /etc/version and /etc/shr-version isn't updated
>>> on
>>> > upgrades.  For example the latest image on
>>> http://build.shr-project.org/shr-
>>> > unstable/images/om-gta02/ is 20091124, I know I am current because opkg
>>> > doesn't show any new updates but according to /etc/version and
>>> /etc/shr-
>>> > version this is what I have
>>> >
>>> > r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /etc/version
>>> > 200911200853
>>> > r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /etc/shr-version
>>> > Tag Name: pre-nov2009-core-updates
>>> > VERSION: 214ca5592a29f4040c19711ad3ea1685cd238251
>>> > Branch: shr/merge
>>> > Build Host: opmbuild
>>> > Time Stamp: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:07:30 +0100
>>> >
>>> > I don't know if this is done by design, but I think this makes
>>> troubleshooting
>>> > and bug reports useless because the first thing that will come to mind
>>> is
>>> > "they are not up to date"
>>> > --
>>> > "We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other
>>> reason
>>> > than only freedom can make security more secure."  Karl Popper
>>>
>>> Yup, these files are not upgraded, as Timestamp contains just image
>>> generation data.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
>>> dos
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>> Which is ok, because we got are (at least ATM) a rolling release distro,
>> and snapshots don't make sense anyway. :P
>>
>
> Well its a good thing I asked than, will these ever be updated in SHR's
> future or are they just there because they can be?
>
> _______________________________________________
>
As I said: "Which is ok, because we got are (at least ATM) a rolling release
distro, and snapshots don't make sense anyway. :P"
So, I don't think so, no.

-- 
Tom.
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to