On Thu, 02 May 2002 11:32:51 +0100, Michael Potthoff wrote: >Has anyone got in contact with speedsoft ? I would like to know thier >point of view. IMHO the concept of Sibyl (creating a delphi compatible
I tried to contact them several times and I also asked for the compiler without luck. I never got a response from them -> forget Speedsoft and also forget VPascal, the author's answer was quite disapointing. So IMHO FreePascal is the way to go, even if it's more work for us. >RAD for OS/2 windoze AND linux) is history by the outcome of kylix (well >at least for windoze & linux) from the commercial point of view. I don't >know what thrid party source might be included in Sybil. Maybe there's a >big problem for going open source. Anyway there should be a contact with >speedsoft. I personaly would give a donation - let's say to netlabs - to >buy the source and continue development for OS/2. Could this be a way >opening Sybil source ? How should we pay that? cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend @ OS/2 Netlabs ICQ: 22419590 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- The OS/2 OpenSource Project: http://www.netlabs.org ----------- To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe sibyl end
