On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:10:08 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> ToDO's:
>> >> - clearance about the licence
>> > We discussed this on the FPC core team meeting this weekend. LGPL
>> >doesn't make it possible to link libraries statically unless you plan
>> > to distribute the product you're creating under LGPL as well.
>> Not right. You can link statically but 'If you link a program with the
>> library, you must provide complete object files to the recipients so
>> that they can relink them with the library, after making changes to
>> the library and recompiling it. ' (preamble)
> Would _you_ distribute your commercial application with complete
>object files?
Why not??? If I want hide something - all hidden. If I distribute project in monolite
binary file, then why not to distribute and in multiple binary files?
>Exactly this formulation makes it unusable for serious
>commercial projects, IMHO.
May be yes, may be no.
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
