On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 12:29:45 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> Not right. You can link statically but 'If you link a program with
>> >> the library, you must provide complete object files to the
>> >> recipients so that they can relink them with the library, after
>> >> making changes to the library and recompiling it. ' (preamble)
>> > Would _you_ distribute your commercial application with complete
>> >object files?
>> Why not???
> Because your project might not look serious in your customers' eyes
>then.
? If customer not developer then I don't see any unserious things.
>> If I want hide something - all hidden. If I distribute
>> project in monolite binary file, then why not to distribute and in
>> multiple binary files?
>1) You have to distribute more than twice as much data.
Yep.
>2) You make it much easier for possible reverse engineering, etc.
>(don't forget you'd have to distribute not only pure object files,
>but unit files as well).
Yep.
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
