On 12/11/2008, at 9:41 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
The authors of these two drafts now believe that all SIDR WG comments
have been integrated into these documents
only withdrawal of the bogons draft would address my comments
randy
I believe the BOA draft documents a structure which is going to be
very useful in the partial deployment world of the RPKI, especially,
partial deployments of origination attestation.
Its going to allow relying parties to tell the difference between a
bogon, and an as-yet un-attested route object. Thats documented in the
validation draft.
The BOA is closely modelled on the ROA. Its logical structure,
associated certification processes, CMS representation, are all close
analogues. I fail to see a structural criticism which is valid, which
does not also go to the ROA, which you seem (from other comments) to
accept as a useful structure.
-George
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
