George Michaelson wrote: > > On 12/11/2008, at 9:41 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > >>> The authors of these two drafts now believe that all SIDR WG comments >>> have been integrated into these documents >> >> only withdrawal of the bogons draft would address my comments >> >> randy > > I believe the BOA draft documents a structure which is going to be very > useful in the partial deployment world of the RPKI, especially, partial > deployments of origination attestation. > > Its going to allow relying parties to tell the difference between a > bogon, and an as-yet un-attested route object. Thats documented in the > validation draft. > > The BOA is closely modelled on the ROA. Its logical structure, > associated certification processes, CMS representation, are all close > analogues. I fail to see a structural criticism which is valid, which > does not also go to the ROA, which you seem (from other comments) to > accept as a useful structure.
i believe you believe all that. this does not alter one iota that the new draft does not address my comment. the security model of the boa is seriously flawed. it mixes a negative model with the existing positive one. this will vastly complicate things and to little utility. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
