WG chair hat off On 29/07/2009, at 7:17 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
We could keep the CP static and have it point to the cert profile RFC (and its successor RFCs), where the algorithm suites can be defined. Or we could have a stand-alone document just for algorithm suite descriptions, to which the CP points, or to which the cert profile points. I think this last approach is preferable as when algs change this would be the only document to change, and it would be a major change. In contrast, if the cert profile is reissued only to reflect alg suite changes, most of the document will remain unchanged.
This approach of a document that specifies algorithms for RPKI objects works for me. What about other interested WG folk - are there other opinions?
Geoff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
