On 29/07/09 7:27 PM, "Geoff Huston" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We could keep the CP static and have it point to the cert profile
>> RFC (and its successor RFCs), where the algorithm suites can be
>> defined. Or we could have a stand-alone document just for algorithm
>> suite descriptions, to which the CP points, or to which the cert
>> profile points. I think this last approach is preferable as when
>> algs change this would be the only document to change, and it would
>> be a major change. In contrast, if the cert profile is reissued only
>> to reflect alg suite changes, most of the document will remain
>> unchanged.
>
> This approach of a document that specifies algorithms for RPKI objects
> works for me. What about other interested WG folk - are there other
> opinions?
>
I think having the algorithms in a standalone document is completely
sensible.
.. so in agreement
Terry
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
