Geoff Huston wrote on 29-07-2009 11:27: > WG chair hat off > > On 29/07/2009, at 7:17 PM, Stephen Kent wrote: > >> We could keep the CP static and have it point to the cert profile RFC >> (and its successor RFCs), where the algorithm suites can be defined. >> Or we could have a stand-alone document just for algorithm suite >> descriptions, to which the CP points, or to which the cert profile >> points. I think this last approach is preferable as when algs change >> this would be the only document to change, and it would be a major >> change. In contrast, if the cert profile is reissued only to reflect >> alg suite changes, most of the document will remain unchanged. > > This approach of a document that specifies algorithms for RPKI objects > works for me. What about other interested WG folk - are there other > opinions? >
Works for me too. > Geoff > Andrei > > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
