Geoff Huston wrote:
> 2. In the context of the RPKI should the manifest document used a
> SHOULD to specify that the resources in the RPKI EE certificate used
> to validate the manifest's signature be specified using the inherit
> bit setting of the RFC3779 extensions?

I agree with this: A MUST would be too strong here; I believe that a
SHOULD is appropriate.

Rob

-- 
Robert Loomans                         email:       [email protected]
Senior Software Engineer, APNIC        sip:    [email protected]
http://www.apnic.net/                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to