>>> I agree that the manifest structure is more general than the RPKI >>> context. >> is that a problem for this wg? i.e. should this, rather narrowly >> focused wg, be doing this work. we could miss a lot and step on >> others' toes. > In principle I agree, but since the toes in question would be in PKIX, I > feel comfortable with a more generic version of manifests. Nonetheless, > if we pursue this path, I will bring the document to the attention of > PKIX and ask that folks review it and comment during IETF LC.
let me be less subtle it might be polite to run that plan by at least tim and stefan randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
