This was sent along (the requested LC message) to the list today...
see you in 2 weeks (at decision time)

-chris
(wg-co-chair-cycling-shoes == on)

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Geoff Huston <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let me try that once again!
>
> The authors have revised the text relating to the definition of the origin AS 
> to be conformant to the current BGP specification, namely that if the 
> AGGREGATOR path attribute is present it "contains the last AS number that 
> formed the aggregate route" [RFC4271]. If this path attribute is not present 
> the draft defines the origin AS as the AS preceding the AS_SET, which is a 
> definition that has been drawn from the earlier WG mail thread on this topic
>
> The intention here is not to impose criteria that differ from RFC4271, and 
> define the origin AS in an manner that if an AS undertakes proxy aggregation 
> in conformance with RFC4271 then this definition of origin AS will correctly 
> identify the aggregator AS as the origin AS. This is slightly different from 
> the various suggestions seen so far on the WG mailing list, but it is 
> believed that this refines those suggestions in the light of a careful 
> reading of the relevant sections of RFC 4271.
>
> The authors do not plan any further revisions of this document, and, 
> accordingly, would like once more to request a WG Last Call of the -08 rev of 
> the document.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>   Geoff
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2010, at 9:50 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The draft's authors believe that the document 
>> draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-07 is ready for WG Last Call, and in this 
>> note we are requesting the WG Chairs to conduct such a WG Last Call.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>   Geoff
>>
>>
>> On 08/06/2010, at 11:01 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> The WG LC has ended.
>>>
>>> There were no responses to this LC.  None.  Zip. Zero.
>>>
>>> This draft has gone through many changes through the years as it has been 
>>> discussed in IETF meetings.
>>>
>>> So the silence must be regarded as proof that the wg had no further 
>>> comments to make.
>>>
>>> I do note that the discussion of terminology (valid/unknown/invalid) in the 
>>> draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-07 draft apply equally to this draft and 
>>> that an author of this draft had alternative terms to suggest in that 
>>> discussion.
>>>
>>> I believe that that energetic discussion is indication that the wg would 
>>> prefer different terminology be used in this draft as well.
>>>
>>> I invite the authors to continue that discussion to come to consensus of 
>>> what terms best capture the desired semantics.
>>>
>>> Any final last call on this draft would be very short indeed.
>>>
>>> --Sandy, speaking as wg chair
>>>
>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>> The presentation "ROA Validation Update" 
>>>> (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/77/slides/sidr-8.pdf) at IETF 77 
>>>> requested a WG LC for draft "Validation of Route Origination using the 
>>>> Resource Certificate PKI and ROAs".
>>>>
>>>> The document (and the draft version history) is at available at
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-06.
>>>>
>>>> The Last Call will end on Wednesday 2 June 2010.
>>>>
>>>> As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and please 
>>>> be clear in your comments to this last call if you are supporting the 
>>>> document's submission to the IESG or if you are opposed.  If you are 
>>>> opposed, please indicate why.
>>>>
>>>> --Sandy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sidr mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sidr mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>>
>> --
>>
>> Geoff Huston
>> Chief Scientist, APNIC
>>
>> +61 7 3858 3100
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Geoff Huston
> Chief Scientist, APNIC
>
> +61 7 3858 3100
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to