On Feb 25, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Russ White wrote: >>> Can you explain the difference in some other way that doesn't mix the >>> two ideas? >> >> Since after reading your message carefully three times I don't understand >> your question, I'm unable to answer it. Sorry. > > You're apparently trying to separate the idea of proving an update > traveled a specific path from the idea of using this information to > actually filter or determine any other policy. I don't see how you can > separate the two --can you explain how you can?
If you can establish the former (that the route did travel across the path it said it did), that outcome can be used as input to policy. This is exactly analogous to draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-01, BTW. Divide, conquer. A commonly used trick in computing. :-) --John _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
