Andrew, I hope I was neutral in neither agreeing or disagreeing as to its utility in my comment.
I was simply checking your assertion that "it would be useful to have a relationship object" and gently trying to understand your reasoning behind holding that view. Geoff On 24/02/2011, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Lange wrote: > Geoff, > > Do you disagree as to its utility? > > Andrew > > On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: > >> >> On 24/02/2011, at 8:09 AM, Robert Loomans wrote: >> >>> >>> On 24/02/2011, at 09:17, Andrew Lange wrote: >>> >>>> From a work item perspective, it would be useful to have a relationship >>>> object signed that says "I'm AS_A, and I have AS_B and AS_Q as legitimate >>>> connections." >>> >>> Geoff published a (now expired) draft for just such an object: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-sidr-aao-profile-03 >>> >> >> and I can push it out again. >> >> Andrew, I assume you are serious in claiming that this would be useful to >> have in this context. >> >> Geoff >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > -- Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC +61 7 3858 3100 [email protected] _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
