> As it stands now, BGPSEC is opt-in. So it seems that clearly > documenting these issues is more operative than make absolute > requirements about them.
Does this mean BGPSEC is not designated as a standards track document? how can a security system actually work if it's "opt in?" It sounds like this is an area that needs some discussion around it. :-) Russ
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
