On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > +1. I don't see anything in my notes on Randy's presentation about "are > pretty much useless and add considerable churn and complexity with little > return from a practical attack surface perspective". The closest I see in my > notes is "Doesn't gain anything against attack where an attacker could just > do a withdraw".
My comment in the initial message: "I think Randy successfully convinced me during his talk at the Quebec City WG session that "beacons" at a frequency of 24 hours (or anything in the "hours" range) are pretty much useless and add considerable churn and complexity with little return from a practical attack surface perspective. " I didn't quite Randy or his slides there, but I stand by my conclusions. -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
