> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > George, Wesley > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:41 PM > -- snip -- > > As far as where this leaves BGPSec, I don't know. Perhaps a solution comes in > the form of > some of us starting to champion the necessary work to move one or more of the > better ideas > from RRG into implementation so that the underlying scaling problem is being > addressed in > parallel. It should be quite possible to incorporate improvements to route > security into > whatever must already be done to improve scale, and even if not, these are > two things that > both share a barrier to deployment, especially incrementally, and would > certainly benefit > from being designed and deployed in concert instead of in separate silos. > > Thanks > Wes George
Wes, Sorry for the belated response -- I was away in India on vacation :) We had some discussion earlier on this list about BGPSEC in conjunction with an RRG scalability solution (e.g., LISP). (You might have seen these posts back in May, but just in case.) http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02836.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02837.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02847.html These posts relate only to the above noted comment from you (but not directly to a different question you've raised w.r.t. the concerns in 4984/6227). Sriram _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
