> From: Brian Dickson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:16 AM
> Sorry to jump in here, but I think that there is a drifting into > conjecture... > > It would be best to stay within the realm of facts. [WEG] To clarify, the issue got conflated between the impact of simple beacon updates and the case where an actual route update comes in, but the signature is processed after the update is processed, potentially triggering a route recalc. Route recalc does mean 2x the processing, WHEN it happens, but it will not happen in all cases. My apologies for being unclear. Wes George This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
