> The only utility I can see is in protecting reachability. > The only problem I can imagine with installing an unsigned > route is that the destination becomes unreachable. If it > was unreachable to begin with, no harm is done.
When you're protecting reachability, what are you protecting? Whether or not someone can reach something. I assume that the "something" you're trying to protect reachability to would/must include things where you enter your password. Hence, I look at this entire problem a little differently than simply trying to enforce a small subset of policies, or as a theoretical exercise... If we can't prevent real world consequences with this work, then --why are we doing it? :-) Russ _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
