On 17/11/2011, at 5:10 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> The process SIDR has used is backwards --choose a solution, then build
>> the requirements around that solution.
>
> the bgpsec requirements document was started from the 2008 document
> draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-10
That document never managed to reconcile the various views relating to
AS Path validation, so I'm unclear if you are citing this as a completed
activity, because to me it certainly appeared to be an incomplete piece
of work.
To be specific to quote from section 7 of this draft:
AS_PATH Feasibility Check: The AS_PATH list may correspond to a
valid list of autonomous systems according to the first
verification category listed in the "Areas to Secure" Section
above. Further study will determine the extent to which this is a
security requirement.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
