> -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:03 PM > > you want the inclusive or, if any one matches it's Valid. otherwise, > you can not do a make-before-break provider switch, for example. > > as to the matching rules, i have extracted a few slides from a recent > hands-on workshop, see <http://archive.psg.com/120314.roa-match.pdf>. > > randy
[WEG] makes perfect sense, thanks. Do you think that it's worth saying this more explicitly here? Something like - " We observe that a Route can be Matched or Covered by more than one ROA. This procedure does not mandate an order in which ROAs must be Visited, because the match is a logical OR, which makes the order irrelevant. This enables, among other things, a make-before-break change for such things as changing providers." Thanks Wes George This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
