The prefix-to-AS mappings used by the BGP speaker are expected to be updated over time. When a mapping is added or deleted, the implementation MUST re-validate any affected prefixes. An "affected prefix" is any prefix that was matched by a deleted or updated mapping, or could be matched by an added mapping.
Shouldn't the two instances of the word 'matched' above be 'covered' instead since covering mappings also affect validation states? -- David Mandelberg Wed Mar 21 13:20:52 EDT 2012 _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
