On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Matthew Lepinski wrote: > > I would like to confirm on the list that the discussions at the last interim > reflect the consensus of the working group. > In this message, I list for each open issue, my understanding of the sense of > the room in Amsterdam. If you believe that for any of these issues that I may > be misunderstanding the consensus of the working group, please start a > discussion on the list as soon as possible. I am currently working on the -06 > version of the protocol draft, therefore, if you have an objection to > anything in this message, please raise it promptly.
While I have no problem with this reflecting what occurred at the interim meeting, I again don't think we can reach any sort of closure on any of the bgpsec-proto work until the Threats and subsequent Requirements documents are closed. If the WG believes we don't need or should ignore those, then I'd really like to just state that that's the case and continue as if they don't matter or simply stop wasting cycles on them. -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
